When Wade got a top edge against Wood in the 17th over, with Australia needing 39 off 22 balls, he blocked the fast bowler’s attempt to reach the catch with an out-stretched arm in what appeared to be a clear case of obstructing the field. However, England captain Jos Buttler, who said he had not been watching Wade, declined to appeal, later saying it was early days on a long tour.
Curran also suggested that there may be scope for such decisions not requiring an actual appeal from the players, with the umpires just able to make a ruling.
“As players, you’re watching the ball go up and we’re looking at that rather than maybe the actual movements of the players involved,” he said. “Maybe that’s the easiest way, just go straight to the third umpire, it’s probably tough for the umpires in the field because they’re probably watching the ball as well.
“Hopefully it doesn’t happen too often, [but] in those big moments, it could be a wicket that wins you the game or loses the game as well so maybe that’s the best way.”
Overall, though, neither side appeared to be taking the incident especially seriously with Mitchell Marsh also making light of it.
“Would I appeal? If it was ‘Wadey’, yes I would. Anyone else? Probably not,” he said.
In the end, Wade was dismissed in the final over of Australia’s chase, and England won the first T20I by eight runs.